Contrary to the claims of its advocates, the LGBT movement extends beyond the oft‑repeated assertion that “what two consenting adults do with their bodies is nobody’s business.” While the phrase may sound persuasive, critics argue it is misleading and conceals deeper motives. One strand of the movement, they contend, challenges parental rights by promoting ideas in schools that encourage children to undergo gender transition without parental knowledge or consent.
Such practices, described by opponents as “grooming,” have sparked internal dissent, leading to the formation of groups such as Gays Against Groomers. However, these dissenting voices have often been dismissed as “right‑wing” without substantive engagement on their concerns, particularly the perceived erosion of parental authority.
Critics warn that this dynamic represents a broader attempt to subvert parental rights under the guise of sexual freedom. They caution against similar developments in Ghana, pointing to instances where LGBT imagery and messages are allegedly embedded in children’s books and video games.
But if their problem is with “right wing” criticism of their excesses, what would they say to the various articles by the left-leaning New York Times, long an ally of the LGBT movement, that portray them as arrogant, reckless, devious, deviant, self-seeking, and corrupt, to the point of losing support among Americans, with the following article on January 19, 2026, “Americans Are Turning Against Gay People”.
The Times’ articles go as far back as December 2015, with a critical piece under the heading, “U.S. Support for Gay Rights in Africa May Have Done More Harm Than Good”, a sentiment that has been repeated many times as the LGBT foray into Africa has taken on the aura of a holy war, with some prominent Ghanaians often “induced” to make favourable public statements to weaken public resistance. (A pastor is said to have rejected financial inducement to join the parade of prominent people making such statements).
**The LGBT movement has responded to African resistance by attributing it to the influence of “conservative U.S. evangelical and right‑wing organisations.” Such claims, critics argue, imply that Africans are incapable of determining their own values without external guidance.
Several articles — including “How the Gay Rights Movement Radicalized and Lost Its Way,” “A Pattern of Lavish Spending at a Leading LGBT Nonprofit,” and “Americans Are Turning Against Gay People” — portray the movement as increasingly self‑serving, seeking relevance long after achieving its initial objectives, even at the expense of national sovereignty and cultural values.
Concerns have also been raised about efforts to reshape language to align with new ideological positions. For example, debates around gender identity have led to proposals that traditional terms such as “women” be replaced with phrases like “people who menstruate” or “people who bleed.” Similarly, words such as “breastfeeding” have been challenged, with alternatives like “chest‑feeding” suggested. Critics view these linguistic shifts as undermining established social and cultural norms, while institutions such as UN Women have remained largely silent on the matter.
There is an agenda to invade women’s spaces (by men in lipstick and high heels claiming to be women) and in the process, taking over opportunities meant for women and even girls. This is why there is a plus sign at the end of their name: To signal that there is more subversion in store for sane society. It’s a classic case of, “give them an inch, and they will take a mile.”
As the debate over LGBT in Ghana rages on – and seeks to distract us from more important issues of our development – it is important to bear in mind that LGBT is about more than what “two consenting adults do with their bodies”. It’s about a takeover of the world by a racist-globalist movement, with the assistance of their local “activist” agents, who believe, as their ancestors did in classical imperialism, that their values are superior and most be imposed on the rest of the world. LGBT is cultural imperialism.
We have a moral duty to resist them – just as Kwame Nkrumah and his comrades resisted classical imperialism and brought us independence and sovereignty. We must protect both at all costs.
Source: Zeeky Bannerman
