President John Dramani Mahama has urged restraint and constructive dialogue in the ongoing national debate on LGBTQ+ issues, stressing that while the matter is significant, it is not Ghana’s most urgent priority. Speaking at a Presidential Dialogue with Civil Society Organisations at Jubilee House in Accra on Monday, March 30, he described the subject as sensitive and emotionally charged, even in societies with long-standing liberal traditions. He called on stakeholders to engage with calm and respect for Ghanaian values.
“In my recent engagement with the World Affairs Council, I emphasised that this is not the foremost challenge confronting our nation. We continue to grapple with the provision of basic needs such as education, healthcare, jobs, food, clothing, and shelter,” he said. The President reaffirmed that the government’s focus remains on tackling pressing socio-economic issues, including expanding access to essential services and creating employment opportunities.
He noted that the ongoing debate over a private member’s bill in Parliament reflects a broad range of views within Ghanaian society, adding that any outcome must be guided by the Constitution and respect for human rights.
“While there are strong and differing views within our society, we believe that issues must be addressed through democratic processes, our core values, dialogue, and the rule of law,” he said. President Mahama also acknowledged the international reactions to Ghana’s handling of the issue, including decisions made by some foreign institutions.
He emphasised the importance of maintaining constructive engagement. “These developments underline the necessity of continued dialogue and mutual respect, as well as the importance of contextualising our national decisions within our constitutional and cultural framework. Ghana will continue to uphold its democratic values while engaging constructively with the international community,” he added.
The comments come at a time of heightened public discussion on LGBTQ+ rights in Ghana, with civil society groups, religious bodies and policymakers expressing divergent views on the proposed legislation.
Source: GraphicOnline
